Henry Barlow: 'Building the Nation'
Henry Barlow: ‘Building the Nation’
Today I did my share
In building
the nation
I drove a
Permanent Secretary
To an
important urgent function
5 In fact to a luncheon at the Vic.
The menu
reflected its importance
Cold Bell
beer with small talk,
The fried chicken
with niceties.
Wine to fill
the hollowness of the laughs
10 Ice-cream to cover the stereotype jokes
Coffee to
keep the PS awake in return journey.
I drove the
Permanent Secretary back.
He yawned
many times in the back of the car
Then to keep
the PS awake, he suddenly asked,
15 Did you have any lunch, friend?
I replied
looking straight ahead
And secretly
smiling at his belated concern
That I had
not, but was slimming
Upon which
he said with a seriousness
20 That amused more than annoyed me,
Nwanachi, I
too had none!
I attended
to matters of state.
Highly delicate
diplomatic duties you know,
And friend,
it goes against my grain,
25 Causes me stomach ulcers and wind
Ah, he
continued, yawning again.
The pains we
suffer in building the nation!
So the PS
had ulcer too!
My ulcers I think
are equally painful
30 Only they are caused by hunger
Not sumptuous
lunches!
So two
nation builders
Arrived home
this evening
With
terrible stomach pains
The result
of building the nation -
Different
ways.
POET’S BACKGROUND
Henry Barlow, a Ugandan poet, is yet to be listed as one
of the renowned African poets; this is one of the reasons why not much details
can be said about him. It is, however, suffice to know that Barlow was educated
at King’s College, Budo, Uganda (1936-48); Makerere University Kampala, Uganda
(1949-53) and Oxford University, London, England (1959-60). He returned to Uganda
to work in the Civil Service, where he became a Permanent Secretary in 1964. He
has written many other poems besides ‘Building the Nation’.
BACKGROUND TO THE POEM
The poem is, in particularly, a reflection on the
ostensible dutifulness of government functionaries in Uganda, and by extension,
all other states of the world where mere ostensibly what remains in
government offices. Using Uganda as an archetype, the poet cleverly exposes the
wanton waste of office hours and the nation’s fortune over a useless official
occasion, which is a now characteristic of the African political state.
In
a subtle humoristic manner, the poet satirizes the detestable antithesis that
is apparent in Uganda: some plough, others plunder; many are hungry, a few feed
sumptuously.
THEME
The poem is critically opposed to the wasteful
spending of government funds and official business hours. Though the criticism
is taunted with humor; the message is made unequivocally that government
officials are hypocritically ostensible. The two major themes that are prominent
in this poem are (a) that both time and money that should be spent on really
building the nation into a virile political state are wasted in extravagant
leisure called ‘delicate diplomatic
duties’; (b) those who really work in building the nation (represented by
the poetic persona, a driver) are compensated with hunger, and those who are
negatively building the nation (represented by the PS) feel sumptuously on the
nation’s future. In a tone that is emotive, the poem seeks to ridicule the squander
mania and ostensibly in government quarters.
FORM AND STRUCTURE
The poem is divided into stanzas, though the stanzas
do not have the same number of lines. Written in a simple narrative forms, the
poem tells the story of a driver who drove his boss (a Permanent Secretary) to
an ‘important urgent function’. The first stanza is what the rest of the poem
develops – the funfair at the party, the return journey, and the aftermath of
the ceremony for the driver as well as for the PS.
The poem narrates a story presented in the
eye-witnessed account, and it is also dramatic in nature. This explains the use
of personal pronoun ‘I and the use of dialogue in stanza 3 – 5. The use of
dialogue and of the personal pronoun ‘I’ is meant to give the story in the poem
both credibility and objectivity.
LANGUAGE AND TECHNIQUE
The language of this poem is that of unblemished
everyday use of language. The lexical choice is simple and the syntactic
pattern is far from being complex. The matter concerned and satirized in this
poem is a public one, and it is meant for public consumption. Therefore, the
poet cannot afford to dispense with pedestrian English, if he wants the message
he presents to reach the common people. In fact, the persona himself is a
common man – a driver.
The figurative language most conspicuously employed in
the poem is alliteration – lines 7, 9, 10, 11, 23, and 24. Line 27 is an instance
of use of irony. In terms of imagery, there are images of both poverty and
affluence in the poem. This is a true reflection of every human society where
the rich and the poor co-exist, though at different quarters of the society.
REVISION QUESTIONS
1.
Discuss this poem
as a satire.
2.
What is the
effect of the use of active voice in the poem?
3.
The theme of this
poem is applicable to all the black African states. Discuss.
4.
In what ways has
the poetic persona been able to infect his audience with his disgust for
wasteful spending of government funds and official business hours?
5.
Government
functionaries build their homes rather than the nation. Discuss in relation to
Barlow’s ‘Building the Nation’.
Comments
Post a Comment
Comment from message gained, lessons learned, and suggestions to improve this blog.